An answer with its source
Inspect the evidence behind the response and understand the limits of what it supports.
For developers & platforms
Before your tool says it,
check what supports it.
Your application may draft a bio, prepare a client review, or help approve a post. The professional report gives you a place to ask what supports the wording you plan to use.
Commercial credential-check integration · In development
A statement in. Support you can inspect.
EXAMPLE REQUEST
EXAMPLE RESPONSE
{
"subject_ref": "authorized-example",
"credential": "Joshua B. Lee contributes to Entrepreneur."
}EXAMPLE RESPONSE
{
"status": "supported",
"supported_wording": "Joshua B. Lee contributes to Entrepreneur.",
"evidence": {
"url": "https://www.entrepreneur.com/author/joshua-lee",
"excerpt": "More From Joshua Lee"
},
"needs_more_evidence": [],
"needs_review": []
}Real public source; illustrative response, not a live API result. This proposed request and response shape is in development; it is not a released API contract.
A concrete use case
Bring one real statement.
The proposed integration checks exact wording against an authorized report and returns the support, sources, and unresolved questions.
A useful result when evidence is limited
Identify the unresolved statement and the information that would help.
The right person and permission
Scope access to the subject your workflow is about and the permissions your organization holds.
Access that fits your product
Bring one real workflow.
Show us where your product uses professional information. We'll work through the evidence question, access requirements, and integration with you.
What your product needs to say
The statement, the person, and the decision it supports.
What your team needs to inspect
The source, the response, the limits, and what changes over time.
What access needs to allow
The authorized workflow, report scope, and expected usage.
A little more clarity
The questions that matter.
Is commercial credential checking available now?
The commercial credential-checking integration is in development. Existing API and MCP capabilities have specific access limits. We can explain what is available today and what your workflow would require.
We already use search and an LLM. Why another integration?
The question is whether your workflow can connect this specific statement to this person’s evidence. Our integration work centers on that relationship, including what the report does not establish.
What happens when the evidence is incomplete?
The proposed response identifies the unresolved statement and the information that would help. It should not turn a missing source into a confident credential or a judgment about the person.
Can I use any professional report?
Access needs to be scoped to the correct person, authorized use, and permissions your organization holds. We will work through those requirements for the proposed integration.